Visions of Ideal and Stable Institutions

monk-at-workBy Amy Carr

Benedictine Oblates treasure a commitment to community, even as the form community takes for us varies a great deal, depending on our circumstances. In the past months I’ve become aware of my own vision for an ideal community for theologians.  It’s an ideal that will never become a reality, but it settles me out to have recognized what I would like, even if it does not exist.

When I think about the kind of school at which I’d like to work, it’s one that has some qualities of a monastery for those who seek lifelong theological practice. There is no tenure; no one has to worry about losing their job except in cases of major ethical violations. Everyone is expected to contribute two hours of physical or administrative labor every day, to help sustain the community as a whole. (I’ve always wished that some of my paid job could involve two hours of physical labor a day.) There is time for communal prayer and spiritual formation, and time for leisure and rest.

This imaginary school is graduate level, but those who have the facility to enter the community may participate for their whole lives if they like. There are classes only on subjects which someone wants to teach and for which a handful or more of students want to participate. There are no grades, only an expectation that everyone will have at least a few people who will read and respond to their work in small group settings. Those who wanted to study for a short time, or just attend a public lecture, could do so. Academic presses would have a peer-review process (and good editing), and would publish books on demand based on their quality rather than on profit margins. Footnotes would be welcomed; books would not all have to be written for a popular audience. Theological depth and intricacy of thought could be nurtured.

This ideal school is also interreligious, especially when the surrounding region has lived religious communities of various sorts (be they old or newly emerging). Theologians who want to do comparative work can meet regularly with members of other religious traditions. The same holds true for diversity internal to a given religion. There would be a space for Catholic, Orthodox, and sundry Protestant Christians. Among the last, those with views of scripture as inerrant could meet with others who shared their view of scripture, and those with more traditionally complex views of scriptural authority (mediated through ecclesial traditions and interpretations)—they too could meet together (and meet with their theological opponents too, if so drawn). Each community would have building space in which to meet for prayer, worship, or other ritual life.

There is so much presupposed for such a community to exist. Funding would have to be secured. This in turn presupposes that people more broadly could survive easily without belonging to such a community — with access to food, meaningful work, and health care. In other words, the stability of a theological institution would be part of a wider stable socio-economic network in which work, security of survival, and leisure are available to everyone.

There will likely never be such a school, nor such a society. Monasteries functioned somewhat like such a school during the collapse of the Roman Empire and through the birth and survival of the Holy Roman Empire, as well as through the Byzantine Empire and into the centuries of Muslim imperial rule, when Baghdad may have been a city with something like what I envision by way of opportunity for interreligious dialogue.

Despite its real-world impossibility, though, I’m comforted by this vision of an ideal theological school, for two reasons, First, when I think about whether to apply for one of the few jobs that might open up somewhere, I’m reminded that another position may not be so radically different from the one I currently have. Why uproot unless the grass really is greener somewhere else? It may be, but how much? Second, by being reminded of a sustaining vision of what I’d like to see, I feel more patient with the messiness and fragility of the actual institutions (ecclesial and university) to which I belong. I can do what I can to foster elements of this larger vision. In Sue Flansburg’s words, I can “keep alert for possibilities.”

The relationship of an ideal theological community to an actual university today is rather like the relationship of the Kingdom of God to actual churches. We participate in Christian life out of a sense of vision that we express in art, music, ritual, words, actions towards social justice, even as we know that the fullness of God’s realm is still to come into being.

When you think about the communities to which you belong, or would like to belong, what ideal form of them do you imagine?

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Visions of Ideal and Stable Institutions

  1. Sister Sheila

    Your thoughts on community are thought provoking, Amy. Thank you for sharing with us.

    Like

  2. I enjoyed reading about your vision for the “school.” In some ways perhaps it does exist among all of the Oblates throughout the US – who are of various faiths, socio-economic status, ethic and educational background, and whose prayer and contemplative styles take many forms. a wonderful gathering of those responding to God’s call.

    Like

  3. Bruce Baumgartner

    Greetings Amy
    What you wrote reminded of something Brother Wayne Teasdale wrote in his book, A MONK IN THE WORLD.

    Brother Wayne kept having a vision during his spiritual journey. It was of a community of mystics and contemplatives that would usher in “a new human order: a civilization with a heart.” Below is the description of what he kept seeing during his meditation.

    “the necessity for a universal order of mystics and contemplatives. They would include people from all traditions or no tradition at all. They would be young and old, men and women, certain and skeptical, confused and enlightened. The movement’s goal would be to provide a universal form of diversity, bringing about openness to change by becoming agents of spiritual and intellectual ferment. Simply by being spiritual in a more spacious way—in an interspiritual way – it would broaden the horizon of our experience and knowledge. Its goal would be to enlarge our wisdom and our scope of action, to constantly radiate attitudes of charity, kindness, love and compassion. The more this spirit spreads the more it will awaken human consciousness to something greater than what we have known.” [pg 218]

    Your question also invoked John Lennon singing the song Imagine in my consciousness.
    My mind then drifted to sci-fi and the freaky ideal of Stepford Wives and it was then I thought I ought to stop! :0)

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bruce – yes – this is part of the vision I was trying to express. It is also a vision of a space for the intellectually intense, the ones who want to read and parse and develop systematic theology deep within their own tradition – alongside others doing the same in their own. And part of the hunger is for a world in which one could survive–not be rich, but survive–with this as a major life practice, at least for half of the day. A world without mortgages, student loan debts, and a worry about how much money is being made by the endeavor.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s